It sounds insignificant, but don’t underestimate the power that self-improvement can bring.
By Tyler Brandt
The world is an imperfect place, full of suffering and tragedy. The humanitarian in each of us longs to change the world. For example, maybe you would like to alleviate crippling poverty, disease, or mental illness. Maybe you wish people would stop killing each other, be it by homicide, war, or even genocide. Maybe you wish every human being could have a roof over her head, a stable income, and something decent to eat.
But doubts may creep in. Who are you to make these things happen? Isn’t it true that you are just a small pawn in an intricate game, subject to the arbitrary power of ruthless politicians and corrupt capitalists? Maybe the only way to make a change is through the political process: by supporting some political savior (like Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez or Donald Trump) or by becoming one yourself. Or maybe you become deeply nihilistic, give up all hope of changing anything, and distract yourself from the awful tragedy of the world by pursuing a life of shallow pleasures. After all, you are just one individual in the face of billions of others.
The question becomes: what are you to do in this imperfect world?
Maybe what you need is a change in perspective.
First Change Yourself
Before you can get to the level of solving such gargantuan, globe-spanning problems, you must first change yourself. It sounds insignificant, but don’t underestimate the power that self-improvement can bring.
Ask yourself what things you can do today to make the world a better place. What bad habits are you clinging to? What behaviors do you wish to change? Are you following a path that brings you fulfillment? Are you taking adequate time to recognize the importance of the others around you? Could your room use a little cleaning? Could the rest of your home use some work, too?
This is the central message of Jordan B. Peterson, a psychologist whose perspective has taken the world of public discourse by storm and has transformed the lives of many.
When many consider the flawed nature of existence, they think that change must happen at the highest level possible. Perhaps they wish for sweeping global legislation regarding climate change or poverty alleviation. Perhaps they blame politicians for the world’s woes and seek to elect “better” politicians or wish to overturn the entire system. While the motivation is understandable, not only is it difficult to design perfect systems, it is also near impossible to actually implement them.
As Peterson says:
You want to be very careful about doing large-scale experimentation with large-scale systems because the probability that if you implement a scheme in a large-scale social system that the scheme will have the result you intended is negligible. What will happen will be something that you don’t intend and, even worse, something that works at counter-purposes to your original intent.
If we accept this premise, what can we do if we still want to achieve good in the world? To that, Peterson says:
You try not to step outside the boundaries of your competence and you start small and you start with the things that you actually could adjust, that you actually do understand, that you actually could fix.
You should restrict your attempts to fix things to what’s at hand. So there’s probably things about you that you could fix, things that you know that aren’t right.
After starting small and realizing how difficult it is to even change things at the individual level, we might develop some humility and rescind our grandiose plans for the world. As Peterson says:
It’s hard to put yourself together, it’s really hard to put your family together, why the hell do you think you can put the world together? Because obviously the world is more complicated than you and your family. So if you’re stymied in your attempts even to set your own house in order, which of course you are, then you would think that what that would do would be to make you very very leery about announcing your broadscale plans for social revolution.
As soon as you start improving, others around will take notice. Hopefully, your growth inspires people in your immediate sphere to grow alongside you. But, if some want to bring you down out of jealousy, don’t let that distract you. All you can do is offer a shining example for those ready to follow it.
If every individual would dedicate themselves towards first bettering their own corner of the world—the part where they have the most interest and the best incentives—imagine how much better the whole world would be.
This Is What FEE Is Here For
So, if you’re up to the task, I ask that you consider joining FEE on a journey of self-improvement. I was once an existential-angst-ridden nihilist with no hope for the world. I started reading FEE articles and gained a more hopeful perspective on the world and a more responsible and engaged attitude toward my own life and career. I attended my first FEEcon three years ago at the age of 20, and my life has been on a better path ever since.
For this year’s FEEcon, our theme is “Set Your Path, Change The World.” I can promise you, you will do yourself a whole lot of good by attending. We will inspire you to change your immediate sphere for the better and help you realize how much good can come from those small actions. It starts with the individual; never underestimate the power of that.
I hope to see you at FEEcon 2019. If you wish to discuss bettering yourself and figuring out your life’s path, don’t hesitate to find me and talk with me. I’ll conclude with a short and sweet Peterson quote:
The proper way to fix the world isn’t to fix the world; there’s no reason to assume that you’re even up to such a task, but you can fix yourself. You’ll do no one any harm by doing so. And in that manner, at least, you will make the world a better place.
Tyler Brandt is a Content Associate at FEE. He is a graduate of UW-Madison with a B.A. in Political Science. In college, Tyler was a FEE Campus Ambassador, President of his campus YAL chapter, and Research Intern at the John K. MacIver Institute for Public Policy.