Bob and I wrote “HOW PRIVATIZED BANKING REALLY WORKS — Integrating Austrian Economics with The Infinite Banking Concept,” in 2010. It was only two short years after the 2008 financial crisis that we all know shook most of the financial world. For those of you that have read this book, you know that it covers a lot of historical and economic ground, including the money dishonesty of the emperor Caesar, whose corrupt actions eventually led to the fall of the Roman Empire.
More than once this year during the coronavirus pandemic I have thought about our United States and its eerie resemblance to the Rome of centuries ago. We are certainly not as old as that ancient civilization which spanned a period of one thousand years, yet the U.S. has been the strongest world power since the second world war. And, it’s an extremely wealthy nation, measured against all other countries in modern times. So, in that sense there are certainly some similarities.
Yet, how many of us, even with the disasters of just this year alone, can actually be convinced that this great country can easily and quickly be reduced to rubble? I would bet, not many. Why do you suppose it’s like that? Is it possible that we may have fallen asleep at the wheel, not paying enough attention, or simply resting too much on our laurels? Actually, it’s neither. It’s the coronavirus pandemic and what all has come with it.
I am reminding ourselves of Augustine of Hippo once again, and especially of what he wrote in 410 A.D. in his greatest treatise The City of God. This profound account was actually written as ancient Rome was being plundered and burned to the ground by invading barbarians who literally began destroying the known civilized world of that time.
My main point is simply this. Augustine, with great amazement, wrote that citizens of Rome could not bring themselves to believe, or even accept, that Rome, with all those beautiful monuments and all that grandeur, was actually collapsing before them—a sobering reminder that it can easily happen in the same way to our own United States, and all of it in the blink of an eye.
So, with these opening comments we pick up our narrative once again where we left off as we introduced to you Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, son of the late Senator Robert F. Kennedy (assassinated in 1968) and nephew of the late President John F. Kennedy (assassinated in 1963). This particular Kennedy has not been a politician, but rather an environmental lawyer. He has spent the last 15 years advocating for proper safety testing of vaccines. He has also achieved an enormous $2 billion victory against Bayer’s Monsanto and its popular weed killer, Round Up, for causing Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in consumers.
In view of the current coronavirus pandemic, he recently appealed and addressed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) with an overture signed by 80 people, including theologians, journalists, prelates, doctors, lawyers, and associations. It is a call to action against the violence in view of the recent injustices to our liberties, including the loss of safety for our children (and grandchildren), and an appeal for dignity to the Church of God.
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., delivered his recent and most powerful speech ever made, not in the United States to Americans where it would certainly be silenced by the media, but in Berlin to a receptive crowd of 38,000 Europeans, (September 1, 2020). 1 Please watch and listen.
In this video of his speech you can sense the sincerity of Kennedy and his desire to eradicate the godlessness we are all experiencing. The one important virtue we should notice about him is that he has so much legitimate and damaging evidence against the measures being used to regulate the coronavirus pandemic and all dangerous vaccines in general.
The amount of information Kennedy has amassed on the various subjects in this article is massive and often technical. There is entirely too much material to cover in a few short sessions. Our readers need to recognize that at times I was forced to paraphrase some of Kennedy’s thoughts on certain topics in order to help myself make sense of it and then fit the information on the page. Hopefully, I was careful enough not to misquote him.
When I began looking into Kennedy’s background, the man and his vaccine findings, it was at the beginning of our forced quarantined lockdowns earlier this year and no one seemed to know much about him. Most of what I found on him was mostly negative and he was presented as an individual you should not trust. Yet, in a few short months he seams to have catapulted into prominence.
This global pandemic has forced me to rely on my instincts when assessing Robert F. Kennedy Jr. I trust that you will need to do the same. We are all looking for honest and believable answers that will help us take the right actions. Listen to his most current interview with Dr. Ron Paul and weigh the evidence presented for yourself. 2
Now, in this THREE-PART LMR series, we continue the “Global Lock Step Scenario,” highlighting Kennedy’s critical vaccine findings and how, and why, he allows us to take aim against The World Health Organization, Dr. Anthony Fauci, Bill Gates, and the Rockefeller Foundation.
Vaccines Are Not Safety Tested
In an interview with Kennedy, special correspondent for “Inside the Vatican,” Stefanie Stark, says that Kennedy addresses the safety and efficacy of vaccines by bluntly telling his audience that vaccines are not safety tested at all. He says that “it’s an artifact of CDC’s (CDC stands for “Center for Disease Control and Prevention”) legacy of the public health service, which was originally a quasi-military agency. That is why CDC officials have military ranks such as “Surgeon General.” 3
He went on to say that years ago “the vaccine program was originally developed as a national security defense against biological attacks on our country by the Russians or other Cold War enemies. The objective of the military was to manufacture and deploy a vaccine very quickly to 200 million Americans without regulatory impediments. The military generals understood that testing medicines for safety takes years, so they opted to call vaccines by a different name—”Biologics”—and permanently exempt biologics from safety testing.“ 4
As a result of that decision, Kennedy says, that the 72 vaccines now mandated for American children have never been safety tested with a double-blind placebo. Consequently, Kennedy argues that these control groups all have tainted results making them dangerous and invalid. (For the sake of completeness, the reader should know that defenders of the current system largely agree that there typically isn’t a double-blind placebo study used to test the safety and efficacy of new vaccines. They will say this makes perfect sense, however, because it would be unethical to randomly deny a certain number of children access to vaccines when we “know” they are so important for their health. The defenders of the current system argue that there is, nonetheless, plenty of peer-reviewed research giving indirect evidence on vaccines, even though they admittedly lack double-blind placebo studies in many cases.)
More importantly, Kennedy questions our rights to force healthy children to take risky medicine against their will? He argues that the question has already been answered in numerous treaties and universally accepted ethical statements like the “Siracusa Principals,” the “Nuremberg Charter,” and the “United Nations Charter,” which state that no government has a right to force citizens to take medicines against their will. But, you might ask, “What about forcing these medications on people while considering the importance of, not so much the individual, but the benefits of the greater good?”
Kennedy’s answer to that question is essentially this: Once we begin telling doctors that they are no longer functioning to serve the individual patient, but rather society as a whole, we enter a slippery slope of troublesome issues. Case in point are the elderly. “We know that 80% of our nation’s medical costs go to treat senior citizens during their last years of life. It could be argued that letting those citizens simply die, or even killing them, would serve the greatest good.” 5
He mentions China as an example. We all know that Chinese parents who gave birth to more than one child was working against what the authorities deemed was the greater good. As a result, the government implemented a policy of forced abortions. That was the Chinese law up through 2013 (when it began to be phased over the provinces to a two-child policy over a couple of years), and Kennedy stresses that these are the types of scary places where you eventually end up, once that way of thinking is paramount.
Is the COVID-19 vaccine safe?
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr, says no. He says that 30 years of experience with the coronavirus and its peculiarities has taught doctors and experienced medical staff that any attempts to make a coronavirus vaccine has always resulted in making vaccinated people sicker. There are dire warnings on this subject already coming from qualified experts like Dr. Paul Offit, Dr. Peter Hotez, Dr. Ivan Lipkin, and even Anthony Fauci himself, who, according to Kennedy, have already put the public on notice that a coronavirus vaccine may end up making people sicker rather than keeping them safe from the disease.
Why does Fauci seem so eager to introduce the new virus vaccine? Is it the billions that stand to be made? But it’s not just Fauci, it’s also Bill Gates and his foundation. Only recently has there been a growing mountain of evidence starting to implicate these two individuals in their efforts to control the sale and distribution of “medications” and vaccines. Most of us by now have come to recognize the scenario, and also that the push back against Fauci and Gates is not coming only from Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.
Is COVID-19 a Wild Virus? Or, was it Created?
The truth is that before the forced lockdowns, most non-medical individuals knew very little about vaccines and how they operated. I was certainly one of them. The initial scare, we came to understand was essential in making us all heed the government lockdown orders. This left us grappling for questions we could not answer. Then the death tallies began mounting on television by the news media, immediately followed by the violence that only scared people all the more. But these men, Fauci and Gates, already knew what was coming and were very prepared when the pandemic hit earlier this year. Watch this YouTube video of Bill Gates’s 2015 Ted Talk, which will give you a great overview of how prepared he really was.
Furthermore, and most recently, a “Columbia Journalism Review”6 revealed the following facts: Bill Gates’ Foundation has steered over $250 million to major news outlets, including the BBC, NPR, NBC, AI Jazeera, and the New York Times, just to mention a few of the 19 press outlets on the extensive list. Consequently, these purchased and basically brain-dead news outlets gave the public zero information during the heat of the pandemic lockdown. What they did instead was to point the spotlight on Anthony Fauci and also represent Bill Gates as a public health expert—despite his lack of medical training, or regulatory experience.
In addition, Gates’s army of “independent” fact checkers help silence his detractors and report them as conspiracy theorists. This allows Gates to continue to champion “biometric chips, vaccine identification systems, sateIIite surveillance, and COVID vaccines,” as an editorial by RFK Jr. asserts. 7
Tim Schwab, freelance journalist for Columbia Journalism Review (CJR),8 says that twenty years ago, journalists criticized Bill Gates and his philanthropic endeavors as simply being a scheme to enrich himself. Or, as a PR exercise to salvage his battered reputation following Microsoft’s bruising antitrust battle with the Department of Justice. But today, Bill Gates and his foundation are portrayed by most publications worldwide with only glowing reports of good works—until we start looking at recent developments.
A Closer Look at Gates and Fauci.
The first COVID-19 vaccine trial began in mid-March 2020. This trial was funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and was developed by scientists at the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) in partnership with the pharmaceutical company Moderna, Inc. According to Kennedy, the concern in the absence of public awareness, is that such vaccines operate by altering DNA expression many times using aborted fetal tissue.
Kennedy explains that fetal tissue has also been rendered carcinogenic, which means that it can cause cancer. According to Kennedy, “a lot of the fetal tissue these vaccines use was taken from a 14-week-old child who in 1966 was forcibly aborted from a woman in a mental institution. There are DNA snippets from that child that are injected with the vaccines. And we have no idea what the implications are for sexuality when male DNA is injected into female babies, and for cancer when tumor cells are injected into healthy babies. There is a possibility that they are permanently altering the human genome with the mass vaccination of this child’s DNA.”9 These are scary issues putting aside the moral implications, Kennedy says.
But, Kennedy informs us that there is such a thing as “created organisms” that are very virulent and extremely transmissible and this is the type of research that the Wuhan lab was conducting in order to develop vaccines. Kennedy says that the Wuhan lab published many studies on them. These studies are also sometimes known as “gain of function” organisms, but are highly controversial because they train the virus to jump several types of species leading to the infection of rats, and then they grow them into human lung tissue.
These experiments, according to Kennedy, were known by many scientists to be extremely risky because sometimes the deadly virus would escape the lab. Nevertheless, Anthony Fauci continued to be a huge champion of gain of function organisms until a petition of 200 scientists angrily denounced the experiments as too dangerous and the U.S. government during President Obama’s administration shut them down in 2014. Fauci, according to Kennedy, simply moved his operation to the Wuhan Lab and started funding gain of function studies again in Wuhan for the same purpose—to develop a coronavirus.
A NEWSWEEK article dated March 28, 2020, by correspondent Fred Guterl expanded on the work in question. “A decade ago, during a controversy over gain-of-function research on bird-flu viruses, Dr. Fauci played an important role in promoting the work. He argued that the research was worth the risk it entailed because it enables scientists to make preparations, such as investigating possible anti-viral modifications, that could be used if and when a pandemic occurred.
…The work entailed risk that worried seasoned researchers. More than 200 scientists called for the work to be halted. The problem, they said, is that it increased the likelihood that a pandemic would occur through a laboratory accident.
…’We have serious doubts about weather these experiments should be conducted at all,’ wrote Tom Inglesby of Johns Hopkins University and Marc Lipsitch of Harvard. ‘With deliberations kept behind closed doors, none of us will have the opportunity to understand how the government arrived at these decisions or to judge the rigor and integrity of that process.'”10
Yes, getting to the truth seems to be our problem as well. We never really know who is making the vital decisions. We are simply told what to do and ordered to keep our masks on.
You may have asked yourself if it was possible for one lab in Wuhan, China, to have accidentally or intentionally released a contagious virus on the world? Kennedy in his interview with Stefanie Stark of “Inside the Vatican,” explained that the U.S. funding ran out on Wuhan on September 30, 2019, and the scientists there were dismissed.
The spread of the virus accidentally or intentionally in this way could have given those now unemployable scientists continued job security, Kennedy explained. “That’s actually what happened with the Anthrax virus in 2001. All of the Anthrax attacks on the U.S. Congress, when traced back, where coming from the psychiatrist who was the head of the Anthrax program that had been defunded. He apparently committed suicide as the FBI closed in on him.”11
More Problems With Vaccine Safety
This next topic discussing Kennedy’s vaccine findings is immensely controversial, and covered with conspiracy theory claims. This is possibly due to a little-known arrangement the government provides the pharmaceutical companies and vaccine makers. In a May 14, 2020 article, Dr. James Hamblin, staff writer on health issues for the ATLANTIC magazine, explains that over the past three decades, the U.S. government has paid more than $4 billion to people who claim to have been harmed by vaccines.
The irony is that prior to 1970 an injured party would typically sue the pharmaceutical company, or vaccine maker, for payment until a new law in 1986 changed all of that. All of this started soon after polio began to fade from memory and the public began to worry about vaccine related injuries. During the 1970s through the 1980s, Dr. James Hamblin says that the average claim increased from $10 million to $47 million. These findings actually measure up against one of Kennedy’s primary claims–that you cannot (even to this day) make a safe vaccine.
In light of these mounting lawsuits, manufacturers of medications and vaccines began to withdraw from the business as profits dropped against shareholder expectations. “In the midst of this, public-health officials grew concerned about the stability of the country’s continued supply of existing vaccines—and the dwindling business incentive for companies to invest in developing new ones. It was on these grounds that Congress passed the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (also known as the Vaccine Act), indemnifying drug companies from further lawsuits.” 12
By the U.S. government having indemnifying the pharmaceutical companies that marketed vaccines and medications, the business became highly profitable once again. But, Kennedy says, that these new government measures have opened the door to massive fraud and corruption.
Corruption and The World Health Organization (WHO).
Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null are frequent contributors of the Center for Research on Globalization and the Global Research website.13 Speaking on the coronavirus, they both stress that the ultimate international authority for infectious diseases is the World Health Organization (WHO). The WHO is the final word in determining whether the spread of a serious pathogen is ruled as a pandemic or not. On maters of global health, the WHO holds dominance.
Gale and Null explain that we are currently being told by the Director General of the WHO that the solution for curtailing the Covid-19 pandemic are self-isolation, distancing, masks, and, for those in acute stages of infection, ventilation. To date there is no drug that has been found to be universally safe and effective. (This is all very familiar information and is exactly the narrative we generally get from television news).
However, Gale and Null point out that all efforts with massive funding are being devoted to rapidly getting a coronavirus vaccine on the market. And in this effort, the WHO is a close ally and advocate in the US’s federal health system, notably the CDC and the national Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) headed by Dr. Anthony Fauci. (This is the organization we earlier learned from Robert F. Kennedy Jr., that makes vaccines that use DNA expression using aborted fetal tissue).
But the most blistering condemnation leveled against the WHO by this Global Research team has to do with the institute’s incompetence and misinformation about the medical risks of vaccines and other health-related chemicals. Most people assume the WHO acts independently from private commercial and national government interests for the welfare of the world’s population. However, they stress, that at best this is an assumption.
The organization has been accused of conflicts of interests with private pharmaceutical companies and mega-philanthropic organizations such as Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, as well as being riddled with political alliances, ideologies, and profiteering motives.
But at this point we have just skimmed the surface of the many other harmful activities that the WHO has been involved in for years. There are serious matters of double standards of vaccine safety, illegal vaccine experiments of depopulation efforts with vaccines, sterilization of children in India, Africa, Nicaragua, the Philippines’, Kenya, and countless other third world countries. Millions of children have been infected, injured and/or died. Dr. Jacob Puliyel, of the Indian government’s National Technical Advisory Group on Immunization concluded, “It is as if the deaths of children in low (and middle) income countries are of no consequence.”
We will look deeper into these issues in my next and final issue in this series. In the meantime, bear in mind that the World Health Organization (WHO), along with Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci at the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Disease, are the people at the helm of developing a COVID-19 vaccine. They are well aware of the fact that there is a lot of money at stake, money that they stand to make, and at the moment they are in complete control. Just how safe should we feel about that?
In the next LMR issue: Part Three, The Conclusion “The Global Lock Step Scenario,” Bill Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation.
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Speaks At Protest in Berlin About ‘Elitist Plan to Enslave Us All’, More than 38,000 take part in rally, August 29, 2020, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IdNp-fJATbU
- Ron Paull, interviews Robert F. Kennedy Jr., on the Liberty Report, September 25, 2020 https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=6&v=_kJdOtnBUcw&feature=emb_logo
- Stefanie Stark, Special Correspondent for “Inside the Vatican,” Interviews Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., June/July 2020 Issue https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-coming-covid-vaccines/
- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., on “Biologics.” https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-coming-covid-vaccines/
- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr., Answer to “The Greater Good.” https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-coming-covid-vaccines/
- Press in His Pocket: Bill Gates Buys Media to Control the Messaging, Article by “Columbia Journalism Review.” https://www.cjr.org/criticism/gates-foundation-journalism-funding.php
- Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. “Press in His Pocket: Bill Gates Buys Media to Control the Messaging,” https://childrenshealthdefense.org/news/press-in-his-pocket-bill-gates-buys-media-to-control-the-messaging/
- Tim Schwob, Freelance Journalist for the “Columbia Journalism Review (CJK),” confirms “Ethical Issues—With Billionaire Philanthropists’ Bankrolling the News,” article, https://www.cjr.org/criticism/gates-foundation-journalism-funding.php
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr., “Explains the Dangers of Fetal Tissue in Vaccines,” interview article for “Inside the Vatican” June/July 2020 Issue, https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-coming-covid-vaccines/
- NEWSWEEK, Dr. Fauci Backed Risky Coronavirus Research, ARTICLE BY: FRED CUTERL, April 28, 2020, https://www.newsweek.com/dr-fauci-backed-controversial-wuhan-lab-millions-us-dollars-risky-coronavirus-research-1500741
- Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Explains the Anthrax Virus in 2001, interview with, Stefanie Stark, Special Correspondent with “Inside the Vatican” June-July 2020 Issue, https://insidethevatican.com/magazine/robert-f-kennedy-jr-on-coming-covid-vaccines/
- Government Indemnification for Drug Companies, By: James Hamblin, Staff Writer for the ATLANTIC magazine, May 14, 2020 , https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2019/05/vaccine-safety-program/589354/
- Richard Gale and Dr. Gary Null, Center for Research on Globalization, Explain the World Health Organization (WHO) and Dr. Anthony Fauci, Article, May 10, 2020, https://www.globalresearch.ca/world-health-organization-deserves-distrust/5712347?utm_campaign=magnet&utm_source=article_page&utm_medium=related_articles